Skip to main content

About this blog

What's it all about?

The focus of this blog is the ancient Greek and Roman philosophy of happiness (eudaimonia) which was the most widespread philosophical tradition in the Western world from when it was first extensively introduced in the philosophical dialogues of Plato in Athens in the fourth century BC all the way up to the writings of the Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius in the late second century CE. In other words, a period of more than five hundred years. Since the core concepts and questions in this tradition was defined by the Socrates we meet in Plato's dialogues - and since all the following thinkers in the tradition saw themselves as followers of Socrates - it seems to be both fair and informative to call it the Socratic tradition.

The "Socrates and the Stoics"-project began as a so-called "Collection" on Google+ and ran for more than five years gathering more than 169.000 followers and well above 30.000 comments. This blog was created in December 2018 as a new chapter for the project after Google announced the end of Google+.

So why do I focus almost exclusively on Stoicism rather than, say, Aristotle or Epicurus - or simply on Socrates?

Because I think Stoicism is the most advanced and well-argued version of the Socratic philosophy of happiness.

But why, then, do I focus almost exclusively on the Roman Stoic Seneca and not on, say,  Epictetus or Marcus Aurelius?

Here are parts of the answer:

"Seneca remains, for us today no less than for the revivers of Stoicism in the sixteenth century, our best representative of ancient Stoicism. In his case as in few others we have the luxury of reading, with their full contexts, whole works of philosophy by a Stoic. He is still an excellent, indeed indispensable, source for those who may wish to learn about, and learn from, Stoicism and its outlook on life."
- Seneca - Moral and Political Essays. Edited and translated by John M. Cooper and J. F. Procopé, Cambridge University Press, 1995, location 446

"Seneca’s writings constitute the fullest surviving evidence for the Stoic view of the emotions."
- David Konstan, "Senecan emotions", in The Cambridge Companion to Seneca, ed. by Shadi Bartsch, Cambridge University Press, 2015, p. 174

I think of Seneca's writings to Lucilius - his letters and the works "On Natural Questions" and "On Providence" - as one very comprehensive introduction to Stoicism and I will be focusing a lot on those works here. I highly recommend the very recent (2015) complete translation of the letters done by Margaret Graver and A. A. Long for Chicago University Press.

Does all this mean that I believe that Seneca is right about everything?

The answer is no :-) I don't even think it is enough to read Seneca to get a full picture of Stoicism. Cicero is extremely important as well - both as a source for orthodox Stoicism and as a very intelligent writer thinking about Stoicism.

The other sources for Greek Stoicism are extremely important as well. I highly recommend Brad Inwood's collection of sources for early Stoicism, The Stoics Reader, Hackett Publishing, 2008. It's a very comprehensive selection of texts with great comments and notes.

Thank you for your interest!

Best wishes
Jannik Lindquist


Popular posts from this blog